Back to Blog

Why Preview.app is not enough

When image work is more than "just a quick look"

Preview.app vs. Phiewer

Preview.app is the default for many Mac users when it comes to quickly opening an image. A double-click, done. This works well for individual files – but only to a limited extent for real image work.

As soon as you regularly work with many images, the requirements change. You don't just want to see an image, but browse through folders, compare, sort out, and make decisions. This is exactly where Preview shows its weaknesses.

Where Preview.app reaches its limits

Preview is not designed as a media browser. It opens files individually and thus forces you into a linear workflow. This has a particularly negative effect when:

  • many images are in one folder
  • RAW files or mixed media are used
  • a quick overview is more important than detailed editing

The result is unnecessary clicking, waiting, and loss of context.

Phiewer thinks from the folder – not from the file

Phiewer takes a different approach. Instead of opening individual files, you work with entire folders. Images, videos, and audio files are displayed directly, without import or preparation. This creates a fluid, visual workflow.

What's particularly helpful is that you can switch between different views. See many images at once, or view a single one large – depending on what the situation demands.

Key Difference

Preview.app is a file viewer. Phiewer is a media browser. This fundamental difference determines how naturally and efficiently you can work with your images.

Conclusion

Preview.app is a solid standard tool. But as soon as image work is more than "just a quick look," it becomes clear: a fast, clear workflow is missing. Phiewer fills exactly this gap and makes file browsing something that feels natural again.